You've been staring at this Trial Balance for an hour. The debits and credits won't reconcile. Meanwhile, there's a marketing case study due tomorrow where you're supposed to apply Porter's Five Forces to Netflix. Oh, and that business law assignment requiring IRAC analysis? Still unopened.
This is what breaks commerce students. You're expected to be three different people at once: an accountant who never mixes up debits and credits, a strategist who can dissect competitive landscapes, and a lawyer who cites statutes without hesitation.
We've been there. Three completely different thinking styles. Same brutal deadline.
Here's what we do differently: when you send us a financial statement assignment, a subject expert works on it. When it's a strategic case study, an MBA handles it. Business law brief? Someone with actual legal training writes it. You don't get a single person pretending to be good at everything. You get specialists.
We Get It. Commerce Isn't One Subject. It's Five.
The Mistakes That Tank Commerce Grades:
- Journal entries with backwards debits/credits. You classified revenue as a liability. Now nothing balances.
- Porter's Five Forces that just lists forces. Writing 'Threat of New Entrants: High' without explaining *why* is worth maybe 20% of the marks.
- Business law answers without IRAC. You explained what happened but never identified the Issue, cited the Rule, or Applied the law. Instant fail.
- NPV calculations with the wrong discount rate. You used 5% when the assignment specified 8%. Every subsequent calculation is now worthless.
- SWOT analysis with zero supporting evidence. 'Strength: Strong brand' tells your professor nothing. Where's the market share data?
📚 Accounting fundamentals shaky? Check our Accounting Help page for journal entry basics.